Is Death Penalty Justifiable Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Is Death Penalty Justifiable - Essay ExampleThis matter entails unresolved issues on its exculpation as a rightful punishment for convicted criminals. Death penalty advocates stress mainly that this system will deter crime and moreover give legal expert or retribution to the crime victims and their families. On the other hand, dying penalty abolitionists believe that demise penalty does not deter crime but kinda promote it. Moreover, it violates the human rights of the convicted criminals, some are may be wrongfully convicted and at that place is an apparent issue of unequal treatment or discrimination of ambitious convicted criminals because of being poor or a member of a minority group.One of the main purposes of having death penalty in the judicial systems was to advocate venerate of committing a crime and stopping criminals in doing so now that they are immobilized or put out of action. But does death penalty on convicted criminals candidly discourage other from doing c rime I personally dont believe so. An acted violence punished by another form of violence results to a cycle of violence. dismay from punishment of a crime wont stop criminals from committing crimes. These proceedings will not only promote its existence as a system but withal its normality. Normality leads to acceptance and is a ticket to apathy as supposed to fear.Advocates s Advocates say that death penalty brings justice or retribution to the victims and their families. I sadly do not agree with this. I do not believe in the basic essence of the word justice in this case. Should there be such a word Death penalty ends the intent of someone who took or damaged the victims life. But does that bring back the supposed life of the victim and their families No, it does not. This does not mean justice, its retribution and more like vengeance. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, isnt it about time to stop this kind of persuasion It is barbaric and inhuman. Given that some of th ese convicted criminals were the author of such horrendous crimes, ending there lives I believe will not bring justice to the bereaved. A life imprisonment without parole is a more likely option with the possibility of reformation on the life of the convicted criminal.Issues on unfair application of death penalty appeals on an accused that belongs to a minority race also are abundant and apparent especially on the United States of America. Procedures on death penalty appeals in the case of the accused or the victim is influenced by his/her race or financial capabilities that is, piteous defence of the accused or inadequate support for the conviction of an accused in support to the victim.This also strengthens the notions of death penalty abolitionists that possible death penalty candidates may be convicted wrongly. In a more practical note, anti death penalty groups say that a session of capital execution or death penalty is expensive and cost more than to imprison the convicted cr iminals for as long as they live. On this note, death penalty advocates answer that death penalty costs can be minimise by limiting the appeals for death penalty. If you come to think of it, this notion will only result to more injustices.Lets just say, what I have just verbalise was a bit indifferent to the pain of the victims and their families who are left to endure more pain. I do not disregard the fact that every victim has a story